My problems with the above (I guess they’re actually below). Not that any structure is perfect. Not that people who go to church are bad people. Not at all. Please accept these as observations on how the structural model falls short of what it could be. This is long; I will put these in bullet form for clearer organization, and attempt objectivity, not including personal experiences but rather general trends.
Pastors and the clergy:
· While church staff should be facilitating the involvement of the lay person, in effect, pastors are expected to do the work. Meaning the body becomes a body of paralysis, with only one limb moving. One limb can’t move without the rest of the body.
· The above pressure burns out pastors. Pastors, I firmly believe, have some of the most stressful careers and highest burnout rates.
· Furthermore, since people aren’t involved in the church, and their main point of contact with the church is the weekly service, people view the pastors’ job as producing an event each week. When the service isn’t entertaining enough, trouble brews, and the pastor may be thrown out.
· Since pastors are professionals, leaving a church means moving, thereby uprooting your family, often with significant financial consequences.
Church building and services:
· Many of these problems arise from basic conceptualization of space. Whereas the early church met in public spaces where the world could see them, and in each other’s houses, today we meet in church buildings. Not only does this mean that a huge portion of tithes goes to building upkeep, but it generates the mentality of segmentation. We ‘do church’ in a specific place, and then we get back to our lives, whereas if meetings were, for instance in our homes, it would be an integrated, organic activity
· In auditoriums, we sit shoulder to shoulder, and look ahead and are entertained. We don’t have to interact with each other, we don’t learn from each other, we don’t share with each other, because meetings aren’t about interaction.
· I agree that music is a great way to worship, but in the Bible, there are soo many more ways to worship God. Dancing, silence, enjoying nature, etc. And yet we have “worship,” as if you can schedule it, which inevitably means three to five songs.
· These three to five songs are points of enormous contention. Rock’n’roll is from the devil, say the old folks. We’ll never reach the world with your ancient hymns, say the young ones. Neither of which are values statements, but preference statements. Repeat after me: church, meetings, life isn’t about preferences. It’s about how God can best be glorified, and I don’t think it’s by fighting over petty items like song style.
· The church “program” makes meetings/services a formula. There’s not even any room for God to move, or for people to discuss what’s going on in their lives.
· Sermons take hours and hours of preparation every week, drawing on the already-stretched time of pastors. And since they’re not interactive, and they’re so commonly perceived of as boring, they have little impact most of the time.
Use of church funds
· Dollars go to buildings and the newest technology to stay “relevant.” The only way to be relevant to people is to “Go, therefore, into all the world, baptizing and making disciples.” In other words, the only way to be relevant to today’s generation is to get into real relationships with them, thereby making Jesus real. It has very little to do with using a Powerpoint presentation.
· Tithes, rather than in Acts, going to feeding the hungry, go to... any number of other things.
Church programs
· At the heart of it, no program is inherently bad. But programs are self-perpetuating. People’s method of involvement isn’t building relationships, but fulfilling a time commitment. Then, manpower and time and funds are consumed with perpetuating an activity, often when it’s not even achieving a particular end.
· Because we have programs, we again segment our faith from the rest of our lives by ‘doing our time,’ thereby earning us the ‘right’ to do what we want with the rest of our time. Not the best attitude. Key example: outreach events inviting people in. Bringing people in isn’t bad, again, but our orders aren’t to cling together for everything we’re worth, forming a human chain to grab that next person so we can retreat back to home base. I like the football huddle model. We talk about what happened, what we’re going to do, and we support each other as we go out ‘on the field’ to accomplish our goals, then at regular intervals, we come back to build each other up again. Outreach is relational, not programmable. Yet programs somehow provide an excuse that we’re performing our duty.
· Rarely do these programs include anything with the poor, and if they do, they’re almost definitely providing material help, which is awesome, but again, I think we should look at Jesus’ methods, and he spent time with the poor, not on a schedule, but as a lifestyle.
General issues
· Since there are so many local congregations, everybody has multiple choices of where they will attend. Then, rather than working through issues, people just leave and take there problems elsewhere.
· I guess it would be efficient just to say it: the current model breeds drama. Drama, often outright conflict that is neither productive nor biblical. God condemns gossip and contention quite emphatically, yet we find ourselves in a system of preferences and power-brokering. And maybe that’s inherent to anything involving multiple humans, but maybe, since we’re not engaging each other, since we’re not being honest with each other, it’s easy to disrespect the needs of other people. Maybe if we were real like the Church in Acts, a body that relied on each other for survival, we would be a little less likely to stab each other in the back.
· Summary: the current church model discourages honesty and real relationships, replacing them with institutionally-mediated interactions that are segmented from the rest of life. We come, we smile, we sing, we listen, and we leave, and no one’s changed, and a lot of people have a lot of hurts that are left to fester.